Home Rice
Norin No.19
Parents: Hashiribozu (seed parent) and 二節 (pollen parent). Crossed in 1929. Bred by Ministry-designated paddy rice breeding trial at the Kamikawa Branch, Hokkaido Agricultural Experiment Station.
Hokkai No.79 HKI0000790
Pedigree
Skip the diagram and read the listParents
-
Hashiribozu seed parent
-
二節 pollen parent
Descendants
Relations are counted along the shortest line of descent. The rows in the diagram follow the order of crosses, so a variety with more than one path down can sit lower in the diagram than its relation here suggests.
Children 1
-
Norin No.42 Hokkai No.103
Both parents are Hokkaido landraces
"Paddy Rice Norin No.19" was crossed in 1929 in the Ministry-designated paddy rice breeding trial at the Kamikawa Branch of the Hokkaido Agricultural Experiment Station, taking "Hashiribozu" as the mother and "Nibushi" as the father
The mother is Hashiribozu, the father Nibushi — both Hokkaido landraces, with neither a Norin number nor a regional one.
Follow this site's pedigrees back and almost everything arrives at Honshu lines: Rikuu No.132, Aikoku, Asahi, Ginbozu. Norin No.19 comes from another root.
That Norin No.19 became the father of Paddy Rice Norin No.42, whose mother was Paddy Rice Norin No.1.
Hashiribozu × Nibushi → Norin No.19 (Hokkai No.79)
│
Norin No.1 × Norin No.19 → Norin No.42 (Hokkai No.103)
The Honshu line and the Hokkaido line join at Norin No.42. Seen from Koshihikari, Norin No.42 is a half sibling — and that half sibling's father's side alone runs off into a different pedigree.
The provisional name was "411"
From April 1934 under the provisional name "411", and from April 1936 under the line name "Hokkai No.79", its seed was distributed within Hokkaido, chiefly to the northern districts with a short rice-growing season, to confirm regional suitability; in April 1941 it was given the variety name "Paddy Rice Norin No.19".
The name changed in three stages.
| From | Called |
|---|---|
| April 1934 | 411 (provisional name) |
| April 1936 | Hokkai No.79 (line name) |
| April 1941 | Paddy Rice Norin No.19 (variety name) |
Paddy Rice Norin No.42's provisional name was "1735". At the same Kamikawa Branch, provisional names were nothing but numbers.
Crossed in 1929, named in 1941. Twelve years.
The preface's count matches Norin No.20's
And the fine new varieties bred by this system already reach 38. March 1943, Agricultural Policy Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
Paddy Rice Norin No.20's preface also says "already 38", in the same March 1943.
| Year of preface | Document | "already" |
|---|---|---|
| 1936 | Paddy Rice Norin No.6 | 10 varieties |
| 1937 | Paddy Rice Norin No.8 | 18 varieties |
| 1941 | Paddy Rice Hokuriku No.19 | 32 varieties |
| 1943 | Paddy Rice Norin No.19 | 38 varieties |
| 1943 | Paddy Rice Norin No.20 | 38 varieties |
Two documents of the same year carry the same number. The count belongs to the year the report was issued, not to the variety — something only two documents side by side could confirm.
Stronger in the years the weather breaks
Its grain is medium, and compared with "Hashiribozu No.2" it is about equal or a little higher-yielding when the weather is settled, while the trial plantings show it higher-yielding when the weather is unsettled. This tendency is conspicuous on clay-soil paddies rather than sandy ones.
Level in settled years, higher-yielding in broken ones.
Chiyohikari was the reverse: "superior when the year's yields are generally high and inferior when they are not" — a variety that rises when conditions do.
Norin No.19 is a variety that shows its difference in the bad years. And the document goes on to say the difference depends on the soil.
Its suitable ground is judged to be the cold-damage districts — the Kitami district of northern Hokkaido, and the Soya districts north of Wassamu — where blast damage is locally light but the risk of cold-weather damage is great.
A variety aimed at cold-damage country. "The Soya 船 districts" appears to be a transcription that has broken down, but since there is no telling how, it is quoted as it stands.
Sources disagree
On naming
Variety names are proper nouns. We use a name in this language only where a published source for it can be cited; otherwise the Japanese name stands.
What we have not yet confirmed
We have not looked below the top twenty
The site covers the twenty most widely planted varieties of the 2024 crop and the varieties that connect them back to Koshihikari. Many descendants exist below that line; we have not yet verified them against primary sources.
The year Masshigura was crossed
Neither Aomori Prefecture's table of recommended-variety characteristics nor the NARO database gives the year Masshigura (Aokei No.138) was crossed. The cross itself, Ou No.341 / Yamagata No.40, and its adoption as a recommended variety in fiscal 2004 are confirmed from primary sources; the year of the cross is not. For the same reason we do not say which parent was the seed parent. On 8 October 2026 we went back to the breeder's own side. The Masshigura page in the variety database of the Aomori Prefectural Industrial Technology Research Center's Agriculture and Forestry Research Institute carries a heading reading “The origin of Masshigura” — with nothing under it. Of the institute's bulletins, only No.42 (2015) onward are online, and the issue that would hold the breeding report for Masshigura is not among them. So the year of the cross is absent from the breeder's own published material as well.
Sources
The source document is in Japanese.
- イネ品種データベース検索システム「北海103号(水稲農林42号)」品種来歴文書 — Institute of Crop Science, NARO ・ primary source ・ accessed 2026-10-01
- イネ品種データベース検索システム「北海79号(水稲農林19号)」品種来歴文書 — Institute of Crop Science, NARO ・ primary source ・ accessed 2026-10-01